AD Norris answer to various books written to argue against his intererprestaion of Revelation
Editor's Personal Note: While AD Norris's propostion that the book of Revelation is not Continous Historical is probably Biblically incorrect, his book is filled with valid criticism of the Twenthieth Century interpretation of the later part of Revelation. Many of his points are well taken. Obviously Dr Thomas did not think the 20th Century would come let alone pass, and thus he finished his interpretaion of Revelation in his day which is obviously incorrect. His interpretation has not been updated with the 20th Centry.
AD Norris is an excellent Bible Student, and while not all his points are correct, his use of Scripture gives us much to think about.