While reviewing the theories presented to the Brotherhood, Keith Cooke presents a theory of the Atonement that conflicts with the pioneer brethren and the Statement of Faith. Useful in gaining an insight as to how those who hold false doctrine defend their position.

Keith Cooke in this article accuses those who believe in the Atonement as presented in the BASF as being guilty of of 'clean flesh' and Nazarene errors. He trys to show that the pioneer brethren and those who followed them believed in 'Adamic Condemnation', which they obviously did not. He accuses those who reject 'Adamic condemnation' of being guilty of believing in "Partial Atonement", as they (and the BASF) do not believe that the cross removes Adamic Condemnation. At one time Bro Cooke was a member of the unamended community. While this book does not follow Christadelphian teaching on the atonement, it does reveal how these error is defended by their group.